Evaluation process for articles:
Articles must be sent four months before the publication of the review issues. Papers are selected by a board of national and international experts in the fields of research in which the review is interested. The manuscripts must meet scientific, ethical and stylistic exigencies. They must also observe the elaboration norms established by the Interstudia review.
EVALUATION FORM FOR REVIEWERS
With a view to establishing the contents of Interstudia, __/___
TITLE OF PAPER:.................................................................................................
................................................................................................
Â
EVALUATION GRID
 |
1
(good) |
2
(satisfactory) |
3
(weak) |
Relevance for the major fields of interest of the review |
 |
 |
 |
Originality of perspective |
 |
 |
 |
Up-to-dateness |
 |
 |
 |
Theoretical approach |
 |
 |
 |
Elements of concrete/applicative research |
 |
 |
 |
Degree of innovation |
 |
 |
 |
Elaboration according to the norms of Interstudia |
 |
 |
 |
Results are clearly analysed and expressed |
 |
 |
 |
Relevant conclusions |
 |
 |
 |
Pertinent references in the field, up-to-date bibliography |
 |
 |
 |
Tables, graphics and figures are illustrative |
 |
 |
 |
Accuracy in elaboration |
 |
 |
 |
Publication recommendations:
Paper publication without modifications   ..................................................................
Paper publication with minor modifications   ..................................................................
Paper publication after substantial modifications
have been made (according to the reviewer’s
recommendations)Â Â Â ..................................................................
Paper not to be published   ..................................................................
Reviewer’s comments
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Note: Please fill in with the data below on a separate sheet of paper, because the reviewer’s identity is not disclosed to the author/s. The author/s will be sent a copy of the evaluation sheet, without the reviewer’s identity being disclosed to them.
Reviewer:............................................................... Date:………………
Institution (Department, Faculty, University):.............................................................................................
Signature,
