Quick search
Go!

Interstudia


Peer Review

Evaluation process for articles:

Articles must be sent four months before the publication of the review issues. Papers are selected by a board of national and international experts in the fields of research in which the review is interested. The manuscripts must meet scientific, ethical and stylistic exigencies. They must also observe the elaboration norms established by the Interstudia review.

EVALUATION FORM FOR REVIEWERS
With a view to establishing the contents of Interstudia, __/___

TITLE OF PAPER:.................................................................................................
................................................................................................

 

EVALUATION GRID

 

1

(good)

2

(satisfactory)

3

(weak)

Relevance for the major fields of interest of the review

 

 

 

Originality of perspective

 

 

 

Up-to-dateness

 

 

 

Theoretical approach

 

 

 

Elements of concrete/applicative research

 

 

 

Degree of innovation

 

 

 

Elaboration according to the norms of Interstudia

 

 

 

Results are clearly analysed and expressed

 

 

 

Relevant conclusions

 

 

 

Pertinent references in the field, up-to-date bibliography

 

 

 

Tables, graphics and figures are illustrative

 

 

 

Accuracy in elaboration

 

 

 

Publication recommendations:
Paper publication without modifications    ..................................................................

Paper publication with minor modifications   ..................................................................

Paper publication after substantial modifications
have been made (according to the reviewer’s
recommendations)   ..................................................................

Paper not to be published   ..................................................................

Reviewer’s comments
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Note: Please fill in with the data below on a separate sheet of paper, because the reviewer’s identity is not disclosed to the author/s. The author/s will be sent a copy of the evaluation sheet, without the reviewer’s identity being disclosed to them.

Reviewer:............................................................... Date:………………
Institution (Department, Faculty, University):.............................................................................................
Signature,


See also in INTERSTUDIA:

Copyright (c) 1995-2007 University of Bacãu